Discuss Implications of these Stats?
Moderators: Global Moderator, Age Moderator
Discuss Implications of these Stats?
http://70.72.80.26/eso2/weeklysupremacytad.php
I know some people blab on about certain civs being UP/OP/balanced, etc. Thoughts?
I know some people blab on about certain civs being UP/OP/balanced, etc. Thoughts?
- Sporting_Lisbon
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:18 pm
- Location: Lisboa
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
Is it for everyone? If yes, it doesn't matter much as it will only show the easiest and hardest civs to play with.
- Kaiser_von_Nuben
- Honorary Member
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:40 pm
- Location: New York, NY USA
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
Very interesting. Well, it looks like the Aztecs and the Indians have a major edge, more so than the overall statistics page would suggest. There were a few other noteworthy points: (1) Native settlers have higher survivability than all others...even more than SWs; wonder why? Don't the Iros, Sioux and Aztecs get raided? (2) Old-line mercs (ie, Jaegers) have significantly higher survival rates than regular units; (3) Ashigarus have an extremely high survival rate considering how many are made and compared to regular muskets; (4) Abus didn't do as well as I expected; (5) uhlans are more likely to die than strelets :neutral: ; (6) Xbows and pikes are pretty lousy in the life expectancy department; (7) Bowriders are awesome and rarely die; and (8) hussars died more than I expected.
Also, I found it funny that CKNs outlived skirmishers!
Also, I found it funny that CKNs outlived skirmishers!
"The German Army will not stand for it!"
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
- Soccerman771
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:25 am
- Location: Sachse, Texas (near Dallas)
- Contact:
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
How is the petard not at the bottom?
jtackel@hotmail.com
"Do you know how difficult it is to micro Napalm?" - Lazy_Tuga
"This isn't going to work. I've picked a water deck and there isn't even a pond on this map." - Blackadderthe4th
"Do you know how difficult it is to micro Napalm?" - Lazy_Tuga
"This isn't going to work. I've picked a water deck and there isn't even a pond on this map." - Blackadderthe4th
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
[quote=""Soccerman771""]How is the petard not at the bottom?[/quote]
he used them to raid
he used them to raid
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
TOLD YA INDIA > JAP IN OP LAMENESS.
ohohohohoh.
+1 for Cammel!
ohohohohoh.
+1 for Cammel!
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
i hate russia so much
- Sporting_Lisbon
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:18 pm
- Location: Lisboa
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
Dear Cammel, go check if they're playing India in WCG.
- Kaiser_von_Nuben
- Honorary Member
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:40 pm
- Location: New York, NY USA
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
[quote=""Tatltael""]i hate russia so much[/quote]
Russia tradtionally gets the highest win % overall. I attribute this to the ease with which a relatively unskilled player can overrun opponents at the lower ranks. I remember when I first played QS as a very nooby Corporal, I won 15 straight just spamming strels and cossacks from an FB. I think that happens a lot, and that is why Russia always has a singificantly higher win % than other standard civs.
And late game they get even stronger. Overall, their individual units really stink. They always get killed a lot more than they kill. But the strength is in the spammage... and take your eye off the mini-map for one second and oprichs might obliterate your entire economy. That's how they do it.
Russia tradtionally gets the highest win % overall. I attribute this to the ease with which a relatively unskilled player can overrun opponents at the lower ranks. I remember when I first played QS as a very nooby Corporal, I won 15 straight just spamming strels and cossacks from an FB. I think that happens a lot, and that is why Russia always has a singificantly higher win % than other standard civs.
And late game they get even stronger. Overall, their individual units really stink. They always get killed a lot more than they kill. But the strength is in the spammage... and take your eye off the mini-map for one second and oprichs might obliterate your entire economy. That's how they do it.
"The German Army will not stand for it!"
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
- I__CHAOS__I
- N3O Member
- Posts: 3009
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:55 am
- Location: ??
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
these stats are useless imho
people pick their opponents sometimes, refuse match-ups or only lame counter civs etc...
I stopped caring about that a long time ago
people pick their opponents sometimes, refuse match-ups or only lame counter civs etc...
I stopped caring about that a long time ago
Wisdom is the supreme part of happiness. - Sophocles
Happiness belongs to the self-sufficient. - Aristotle
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
[quote=""Sporting_Lisbon""]Is it for everyone? If yes, it doesn't matter much as it will only show the easiest and hardest civs to play with.[/quote]
Well, the easyness of a civ to play would contribute to it be OP, wouldn't it?
Well, the easyness of a civ to play would contribute to it be OP, wouldn't it?
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
I think it's odd, that the native civs do not have many people using them, but their win %'s are among the best. Just an observation...
"Nature doesn't like Agra forts." - Sporting Lisbon
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria. - Ben Franklin
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria. - Ben Franklin
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
[quote=""cleeduz""]I think it's odd, that the native civs do not have many people using them, but their win %'s are among the best. Just an observation...[/quote]
Interesting indeed...
Interesting indeed...
- Kaiser_von_Nuben
- Honorary Member
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:40 pm
- Location: New York, NY USA
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
[quote=""36drew""][quote=""cleeduz""]I think it's odd, that the native civs do not have many people using them, but their win %'s are among the best. Just an observation...[/quote]
Interesting indeed...[/quote]
My explanation: 10+9 maces, coyote combat, 6 pumas, 2 free skulls, converted guardians, 5 coyotes built, 5 coyotes shipped, attack at 5:40; if they're still alive, mass coyotes and maces, send 3 priests, do a war dance. GG.
Interesting indeed...[/quote]
My explanation: 10+9 maces, coyote combat, 6 pumas, 2 free skulls, converted guardians, 5 coyotes built, 5 coyotes shipped, attack at 5:40; if they're still alive, mass coyotes and maces, send 3 priests, do a war dance. GG.
"The German Army will not stand for it!"
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
- Sporting_Lisbon
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:18 pm
- Location: Lisboa
Re: Discuss Implications of these Stats?
[quote=""36drew""][quote=""Sporting_Lisbon""]Is it for everyone? If yes, it doesn't matter much as it will only show the easiest and hardest civs to play with.[/quote]
Well, the easyness of a civ to play would contribute to it be OP, wouldn't it?[/quote]
Russia's easier to play for a corporal than Japan laming because they don't even know of it, that's what I mean.
Well, the easyness of a civ to play would contribute to it be OP, wouldn't it?[/quote]
Russia's easier to play for a corporal than Japan laming because they don't even know of it, that's what I mean.