GGs
Game 1:
My azzie against his ports.
He gets first pick of map, and chooses GP. I start out boomy, trying to get an eco going a bit, and gather some gold in case I need to follow him into fortress soon. But I see a lot of musks and some huss, so I decide to just go mace/puma. I get a decent mass going, and then start to push. Been liking pumas a lot lately.
Game 2:
My Otto vs His Japan
I go with my fav map sonora and start out with TP's. He starts with a nice yumi mass, and I go with abus and then some jans. We clash a bit inside his base, but I get stagecoach and start getting some resources coming in, and abus save the day.
Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
Moderators: Global Moderator, Age Moderator
Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Sporting_Lisbon
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:18 pm
- Location: Lisboa
Re: Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
How can you love sonora!!!
Also Destructor deserved to lose just because he picked gp, most played map ever
Regarding pumas, pumas haven't really ever taken the love they deserve. They've the same price in villager seconds as warclubs but they have far better stats.
Also Destructor deserved to lose just because he picked gp, most played map ever
Regarding pumas, pumas haven't really ever taken the love they deserve. They've the same price in villager seconds as warclubs but they have far better stats.
-
frenchfantom
- N3O Member
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:52 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
yeah i wayyyy underestimated etrips hes a much better player than i am...
-
Aaryn_GenD
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:59 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
etrips == OP!
Re: Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
[quote=""Sporting_Lisbon""]How can you love sonora!!![/quote]
I just like it because it usually plays out well to aggressive civs. With the resources being so scarce, you really have to fight for map control, which I think fits well for when I play aztec and otto for example. Could just be from my experience tho
I just like it because it usually plays out well to aggressive civs. With the resources being so scarce, you really have to fight for map control, which I think fits well for when I play aztec and otto for example. Could just be from my experience tho
-
Sporting_Lisbon
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:18 pm
- Location: Lisboa
Re: Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
I agree with your perspective, I just find the lag obnoxious 
I always had a lot of success in sonora when using rushing civs / strats.
I always had a lot of success in sonora when using rushing civs / strats.-
jerom
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:48 am
- Location: Netherlands, Utrecht
- Contact:
Re: Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
I like Sonora because it is one of the few maps that don't annoy me ( somehow most other maps annoy me, don't know why)
anyway could you choose a map like texas ?
anyway could you choose a map like texas ?
Soccerman771 wrote:Just make sure you do keep some blood in your alcohol system, ok.
Re: Group 2: Etrips vs Destructor
[quote=""Sporting_Lisbon""]I agree with your perspective, I just find the lag obnoxious I always had a lot of success in sonora when using rushing civs / strats.[/quote]
I had no idea the map was known for lag..anyone know why it is?
And yeah jerom you can choose Texas for your homemap (as far as I know)
I always had a lot of success in sonora when using rushing civs / strats.[/quote]I had no idea the map was known for lag..anyone know why it is?
And yeah jerom you can choose Texas for your homemap (as far as I know)