Page 3 of 3

Re: Nav vs. Drew

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:53 pm
by KingKaramazov
So are Dutch and Sioux in their own way.

OP civs are bad because they are no fun to play AGAINST.

Heh.

And hell, I won't fault you for playing China. I've done it myself plenty.

I just find it funny because you always gave me such a hard time for doing it. Haha.

Re: Nav vs. Drew

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:57 am
by Sporting_Lisbon
OP civs are bad because they are no fun to play AGAINST.
That sums it all.

Re: Nav vs. Drew

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:55 am
by Navarone_Guy
Sorry about that, KK.

Re: Nav vs. Drew

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:00 am
by LaZy
Ill try and review this game 2morrow. Sounds like a damn good game though. Cant wait

Re: Nav vs. Drew

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:40 pm
by LaZy
Just watched the game. Cool but short game. It kinda ended at the wrong moment. Drew went ( as Ottos usually does) for a strong eco via a heavy Trade Route. ATP and silk road in ur deack are a dead give away to that strat. Aztec massed those horrible coyotes and maces 2 back em up. Drew excelled by make a dozen of Hussars. Now thats what I call an amazingly strong duo Hussars and Abus guns. I agree with Sporting. Grens would have been an even better choice, but ( as he knows himself) I luv those OP (even if they r nerfed atm) abus guns.Was a gg for drew until Harley suddenly shows up with Jags. If those had been in ur army when u attacked him with all ur might u´d of had drew there and then. And then the game just stops. Pity really cos that game could have gone either way still.Out