Page 1 of 1

2v2 with Esam vs a captain and a 2nd lieut

Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:05 am
by Sporting_Lisbon
Brit + aztec vs brit + germans on rockies. Nice game, we go for a strong rush but then Esam's eco pays the price of the heavy rush. Brit OP, nerf quickly, I don't think that this eco power and army power is balanced.

Re: 2v2 with Esam vs a captain and a 2nd lieut

Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:50 am
by Aaryn_GenD
ehm what? didn't understand a thing^^

Re: 2v2 with Esam vs a captain and a 2nd lieut

Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 6:02 pm
by Sporting_Lisbon
We try to push quickly but in order to keep the early mass Esam couldn't keep up his vill production. OP brits still manage to fight nearly 1v2 with an OP eco and above average army which certainly isn't balanced.

Re: 2v2 with Esam vs a captain and a 2nd lieut

Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 6:39 pm
by Aaryn_GenD
how about you replace OP brits with OP sporting? :-)
i mean you certainly mean your brits in that game or? you guys won so you must be talking of your brits :-P

Re: 2v2 with Esam vs a captain and a 2nd lieut

Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:03 pm
by deadhanddan
[quote=""Sporting_Lisbon""]We try to push quickly but in order to keep the early mass Esam couldn't keep up his vill production. OP brits still manage to fight nearly 1v2 with an OP eco and above average army which certainly isn't balanced.[/quote] i have been saying this since fp 1.1's release that fp brits are imbalanced. reason they are not on RE patch is OP asains and native americans , but in fp they are nerfed ---- which brings brits out from a 2nd tier civ to top tier civ. just my .02$

Re: 2v2 with Esam vs a captain and a 2nd lieut

Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:27 pm
by Sporting_Lisbon
[quote=""Aaryn_GenD""]how about you replace OP brits with OP sporting? :-)
i mean you certainly mean your brits in that game or? you guys won so you must be talking of your brits :-P[/quote]

lol i meant what DHD said, brits are way too strong and in that game I demonstrate it

Re: 2v2 with Esam vs a captain and a 2nd lieut

Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:47 pm
by esam709
It was funny I was age 2 with a humble village and a small noble army while Sporting was age 4 with factories and a huge metropolis. I did many things wrong that game though, one of those things was no market.

Brits are a good civ. Sporting playing brits means they are OP.