N3O Age Of Empires and Starcraft 2 Clan

russia can FF on siberia, lots of good hunts, tower next to gold mine

[quote=""IndyBrit""]Is anyone else amused that Russia sucks on Siberia?[/quote]

They do?

[quote=""IndyBrit""]Is anyone else amused that Russia sucks on Siberia?[/quote]

I didn't say they suck, i said they have problems. Try to face a boomy Civ (Brits, Japs, India) or a Civ that has a good FF there (French, Germans, Ottos...). You'll see what i mean. They have this tower as well to defend rushes and their FF is better than the russian FF. But maybe it's just me.

indy ment that it is ironic that russia would have problems on siberia as it is russia's home turf

[quote=""deadhanddan""]indy ment that it is ironic that russia would have problems on siberia as it is russia's home turf[/quote]

What does "ironic" mean? ops:

ironic is a word used to describe something that is unexpected and coincidental , such as russia failing on a map such as siberia would be considered ironic because siberia happens to be located in russia

[quote=""deadhanddan""]ironic is a word used to describe something that is unexpected and coincidental , such as russia failing on a map such as siberia would be considered ironic because siberia happens to be located in russia [/quote]

Thanks for answering my question

[quote=""deadhanddan""]ironic is a word used to describe something that is unexpected and coincidental , such as russia failing on a map such as siberia would be considered ironic because siberia happens to be located in russia [/quote]

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Irony


This link should clear things up

i prefer webster's defintion , easier to understand

I was being ironic woot

Just read any satire I write on my blog and you'll know what irony means

What about the Brits? They are pretty difficult to play in 1v1, at least, I find them harder than the Germans. I think they are much better in team games. I don't know if they are underrated, but they are certainly tricky to learn at the beginning. I mean, try defending an Agra Fort rush or something without any military shipments. Brits only get strong after their 700/600 wood shipments kick in. Before that, it's a struggle.

I've lost times enough as iro vs brits to guarantee that they are slightly underrated, their boomy abilities with a decent lb/pike management are absolutely evil.

The ottomans are dieing out..... on nilla every game had one in it, but on tad, i hardly see them. I suppose its cause they are pretty sucky the only way i think otto is op is when its a 2v2 and his ally is russia, then they both rush as fast as they can, good combination. Strelets+jans is a tough one to beat if they have good micro. Me and a friend beat some lamers by both of us going brits and doing lb/pike. Mass LI beats it okay, but those cossacks are annoying.

double brits lame?

[quote=""generalbuschmann""]double brits lame?[/quote]

Sometimes! Straight double LB/musket or double LB/pike with manor boom is pretty OP.

Try triple Brits... even better.