Re: The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:10 pm
[quote=""Aaryn_GenD""]in this game, i say experience is the true value. couple that with a decent amount of speed of course.
i think that there is not that much of a great margin between the players, in other games this is far more extreme,
here drew could win against a top player after like 10-15 tries, in a game like wc3 no chance at all, you can play 1000 times you won't win a single one if you're not a top playe yourself ofc
the harder a game is to play, the more skilled players are there.
i heard the best guys left this game in early 2006.. so hardly half a year
that is the reason why sc, counterstrike and wc3 are present at every WCG or every tournament, it was really a nice chance for aoe3 to be in WCG 2 times[/quote]
Not true, don't forget that aoc and aom went to wcg quite often too. It's just the difference between Valve and Blizzard vs Microsoft, that is the crap thing to ever come to the gaming industry in terms of making business. Do you guys remember any Microsoft sponsored tourney? I remember only one and it was a miracle done with a great deal of help by Saint Solus in twc.
wc3 is a matter of micro, that game is so micro dependent that you have a Hero with different spells, units that also have some weird spells, a villager pop of around 30-40 max if memory doesn't fail and your army will never be much bigger than 30 units. The economy is so simple in comparison to aoe3 and aoc that it feels the game is missing something. The faster maniac wins? meh... Also, in an RTS I don't expect to have to level up a Hero to get better spells :\
i think that there is not that much of a great margin between the players, in other games this is far more extreme,
here drew could win against a top player after like 10-15 tries, in a game like wc3 no chance at all, you can play 1000 times you won't win a single one if you're not a top playe yourself ofc
the harder a game is to play, the more skilled players are there.
i heard the best guys left this game in early 2006.. so hardly half a year
that is the reason why sc, counterstrike and wc3 are present at every WCG or every tournament, it was really a nice chance for aoe3 to be in WCG 2 times[/quote]
Not true, don't forget that aoc and aom went to wcg quite often too. It's just the difference between Valve and Blizzard vs Microsoft, that is the crap thing to ever come to the gaming industry in terms of making business. Do you guys remember any Microsoft sponsored tourney? I remember only one and it was a miracle done with a great deal of help by Saint Solus in twc.
wc3 is a matter of micro, that game is so micro dependent that you have a Hero with different spells, units that also have some weird spells, a villager pop of around 30-40 max if memory doesn't fail and your army will never be much bigger than 30 units. The economy is so simple in comparison to aoe3 and aoc that it feels the game is missing something. The faster maniac wins? meh... Also, in an RTS I don't expect to have to level up a Hero to get better spells :\