Page 1 of 1

Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:19 pm
by Sporting_Lisbon
So this matchup benefits the sioux player (obviously) and this guy attempts to lame sevastopol spreading blockhouses, tcs and walls. I think it's good to see how unstoppable the sioux can be.

I'm gonna try to play sioux, instead of japs now. Japs are a bit tiring after a while. Perhaps sioux haters > ashi haters, but I don't care :p

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:59 pm
by KingKaramazov
I want to see Russia wins!

I was tempted to post my win against you yesterday, but you played badly so I didn't. :P

I have to say, though, I'm kind of tempted to play Sioux some myself just for a change. Plus in many ways they're a lot easier than really any other civ.

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:07 am
by Sporting_Lisbon
Lol it's ok :p I have the excuse that I was playing at 2 am, but if you want to post a russia win go for it ^^

Heh, then I can try to play my sucky russians vs your sioux :-D

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:25 am
by kingchrisII
soux are VERY easy to play imo lol no houses, evry little wood needed

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:27 am
by KingKaramazov
It's not even so much the houses, just the easily spammable units, the incredibly fast WC that makes all the cav uncatchable raiding is a breeze, and so on.

I mean, they aren't a no-brainer civ by any means (there isn't one) but it is pretty simple at least to be decent with them.

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:33 am
by I__CHAOS__I
yeah , sioux is damn easy to play, and no houses is a huge bonus.

dunno if russia can actually beat sioux... siege dance > sevastapol
maybe on water maps they have a better chance.

I wonder how sioux would be with a normal explorer instead of sioumacher

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:46 am
by Sporting_Lisbon
Hum some civs are still easier to play on my book :p Like otto, dutch and china. Yes, but for aggressive players it's damn easy to play and I think I'll stick with them for a while ^^

I would nerf the wakinas before the warchief. And the firepit is totally broken, overall native civs are quite messy when talking about balance.

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:00 am
by KingKaramazov
I don't think Otto are actually that easy to play. The crap eco makes up for the automatically produced villagers. You really pay as Otto every time you lose a villager or a unit.

I agree with Chaos though, Sioux >> Russia. Although if the Russia gets late game they can just spam walls and forts and wear them down with Oprichniks, especially since the Sioux have no walls (huge weakness late game). But that's true of any matchup for Russia, and Russia will never survive that long against Sioux anyway.

Re: Sioux vs Russia, Lt. Colonel vs Lt. Colonel on Texas

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:41 am
by kingchrisII
sporting, watched the game, man tht guy sucks, u had seige dance yet her still made biuldings haha, very well played though