What I would like to watch.

[TheSandwich]

I would like some people to post some treaty games, just because they are so interesting to watch. I would like to watch somebody that really knows what they are doing so i can gain a good strategy.

Just a request! If you do post one, send me a message to let me know that you have posted it.

Thanks a lot!!

[lordandcount]

What kind of treaty? nr 10,20,30 or 40? And for what civ? Sorry the amount of questions

[Sporting_Lisbon]

I don't think that many people play treaty here but you can be lucky

[lordandcount]

I play treaty sometime and I'm not too bad at doing that

[36drew]

I can do 10/20.

[joe4holly]

I do tr 20.

[TheSandwich]

40 if possible, I want to gain a few tips with France.

Thanks

[lordandcount]

K I could help you with that, at what time and at what day are you normally online?

[emperoral]

What I really would like to watch is Nottingham Forest win some games this year lol

doh aoe Well would not mind viewing a few deathmatch games

[Soccerman771]

Treaty 40 is a waste of 1.5 hours IMO...

[lordandcount]

Well I started as a nr player and still I can boom very good (I think/hope). And it can be fun to have all thoose massive battles

[Kaiser_von_Nuben]

[quote=""Soccerman771""]Treaty 40 is a waste of 1.5 hours IMO...[/quote]

I have to agree on this. I do like nr 10 and nr 20, although I am better at 10 than 20.

[IndyBrit]

40 NR is pretty bad. I think it takes me about 31 minutes (depends on map) with Brits, French, or Ports to have full eco for eternal spamming and every upgrade in the game (including those I'm never gonna use). Once you're there, what else is there?

Of course, I'm not Michaelangelo with my walls, so maybe I need to learn the artistic side of the game to entertain myself for 9 minutes. I've seen people that I'm pretty sure are trying to spell their own name - in cursive.

[LaZy]

The whole NR thing makes me feel better about myself. It clearly shows that there are many people out there that have even more time 2 waste than I.

I dont play NR. The point in NR is......???
From a historical POV, and Kaiser will surely correct me if Im wrong, most, memorable and often even decisive battles, where pretty much NR. Both "parties" would literally set up their units in the agreed locations and on time. (Would be rude to show up 4 a battle l8. This is why Portugal never had real wars. We´d b l8 4 half of them. And thats not very gentleman like.)
After having a very formal verbal confrontation with both "parties" sending in either messengers or representatives, or the big boys themselves occasionaly, and the "terms" and "conditions" would be politely set. Agreed upon or not.

So, I believe the whole NR and HM thing 2 b a waste of time but very realistic. Just wanted 2 make sure we´re all on the same turf on this. Thank u 4 ur time and have a great day.

out

PS Al Queida should do a little NR next time round. This whole guerrila tactics is 2 OP. I guess we can call old bearded Bin a LAMER. Raiding vills with petards is simply sad and should be nerfed in the next patch.

[GeneralMichael]

[quote=""lordandcount""]K I could help you with that, at what time and at what day are you normally online?[/quote]

If you want lordandcount we could do a 40min treaty against each other so he can see 2 different strategies. I can go on almost anytime sunday, saturday mornings I could do and weekdays vary. Though I hate to do 1v1 treaties. In 1v1 ones for treaty I do not watch all the sides well enough thats why I play mostly team treaties since then for somereason I scan the map a lot more. Though just to let you know Treaty is where I'm best at. I love to be sneaky in treaties i get people distracted on one side then bam I have a huge army on the opposite side of the map that is bringing down barracks and stuff before they have much time to respond