The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
Moderators: Global Moderator, Age Moderator
- Kaiser_von_Nuben
- Honorary Member
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:40 pm
- Location: New York, NY USA
Re: The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
Bah, I was in my senior year of high school :?
"The German Army will not stand for it!"
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
-Colonel Bockner, King Solomon's Mines (1985)
Re: The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
[quote=""thanster""]i was 4...... [/quote]
Same
Same
- Aaryn_GenD
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 3555
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:59 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
[quote=""Sporting_Lisbon""][quote=""Aaryn_GenD""]in this game, i say experience is the true value. couple that with a decent amount of speed of course.
i think that there is not that much of a great margin between the players, in other games this is far more extreme,
here drew could win against a top player after like 10-15 tries, in a game like wc3 no chance at all, you can play 1000 times you won't win a single one if you're not a top playe yourself ofc
the harder a game is to play, the more skilled players are there.
i heard the best guys left this game in early 2006.. so hardly half a year
that is the reason why sc, counterstrike and wc3 are present at every WCG or every tournament, it was really a nice chance for aoe3 to be in WCG 2 times[/quote]
Not true, don't forget that aoc and aom went to wcg quite often too. It's just the difference between Valve and Blizzard vs Microsoft, that is the crap thing to ever come to the gaming industry in terms of making business. Do you guys remember any Microsoft sponsored tourney? I remember only one and it was a miracle done with a great deal of help by Saint Solus in twc.
wc3 is a matter of micro, that game is so micro dependent that you have a Hero with different spells, units that also have some weird spells, a villager pop of around 30-40 max if memory doesn't fail and your army will never be much bigger than 30 units. The economy is so simple in comparison to aoe3 and aoc that it feels the game is missing something. The faster maniac wins? meh... Also, in an RTS I don't expect to have to level up a Hero to get better spells :\[/quote]
aom and aoc were alot harder to play than simplified aoe3, there were tons of threads i saw at the beginning of the game critcizing aoe3 is for newbs.
also the times back then were totally different, playing an online gameswas something special, nowadayplaying online games is like standard
and yes, blizzard is miles ahead of microsoft coming to "How do i support the online community of my freshly released game?"
i think that there is not that much of a great margin between the players, in other games this is far more extreme,
here drew could win against a top player after like 10-15 tries, in a game like wc3 no chance at all, you can play 1000 times you won't win a single one if you're not a top playe yourself ofc
the harder a game is to play, the more skilled players are there.
i heard the best guys left this game in early 2006.. so hardly half a year
that is the reason why sc, counterstrike and wc3 are present at every WCG or every tournament, it was really a nice chance for aoe3 to be in WCG 2 times[/quote]
Not true, don't forget that aoc and aom went to wcg quite often too. It's just the difference between Valve and Blizzard vs Microsoft, that is the crap thing to ever come to the gaming industry in terms of making business. Do you guys remember any Microsoft sponsored tourney? I remember only one and it was a miracle done with a great deal of help by Saint Solus in twc.
wc3 is a matter of micro, that game is so micro dependent that you have a Hero with different spells, units that also have some weird spells, a villager pop of around 30-40 max if memory doesn't fail and your army will never be much bigger than 30 units. The economy is so simple in comparison to aoe3 and aoc that it feels the game is missing something. The faster maniac wins? meh... Also, in an RTS I don't expect to have to level up a Hero to get better spells :\[/quote]
aom and aoc were alot harder to play than simplified aoe3, there were tons of threads i saw at the beginning of the game critcizing aoe3 is for newbs.
also the times back then were totally different, playing an online gameswas something special, nowadayplaying online games is like standard
and yes, blizzard is miles ahead of microsoft coming to "How do i support the online community of my freshly released game?"
- Sporting_Lisbon
- N3O Officer
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:18 pm
- Location: Lisboa
Re: The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
I agree, but the game isn't there because there's no interest in it from a lot of people. Yes, I think anyone should see an aoc expert playing. The keyboard is a machine gun, like totally wth
Re: The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
[quote=""deadhanddan""]there was a movie made about such a thing called '' johny Mneumonic '' starring Keanu Reeves who plays as a digital info smuggler[/quote]
Funny think is, it's about a guy that smuggled insane amounts of data in his brain. I read recently that the human brain holds like 350 megs. lol
Mac
Funny think is, it's about a guy that smuggled insane amounts of data in his brain. I read recently that the human brain holds like 350 megs. lol
Mac
Re: The thing i've noticed about Brig ++ players...
there are drives out there that hold 5 terabites..... huge...... O_O
that was random
that was random
Charge you cowards! no one lives forever! - unknown platoon sargeant, 1917